Posted by Steve Wardell on 12 November 2012 | 0 Comments
It’s likely that, just by logging on, you participated in a major GOTV (Get Out The Vote) initiative by Facebook. . . plus a social network analysis of voting behavior by Facebook data scientists and UCSD professor James Fowler. (Fowler’s also a member of Activate Networks Advisory Board.)
The Facebook-Fowler research team has been tracking the effects of online social networks (Facebook, in particular) on voting. Their previous study analyzed Facebook’s effect on getting out the vote during the 2010 Election. (Those results were published this fall in Nature, and reported in our Blogs of September 13, 14, and 18, and November 5).
Fowler was interviewed after last week’s Election by The Atlantic’s Associate Editor Rebecca J. Rosen, who poses the question, “Upending predictions, young voters made a strong showing at the polls. Did they go because ‘everybody's doing it,’ as they saw on Facebook?”
And Fowler’s reply? According to Rosen, Fowler says that it’s “absolutely plausible that Facebook drove a lot of the increase" in young-voter participation, and “even possible that Facebook is completely responsible.”
Think back to Tuesday. Did you see a message at the top of your Facebook page (and I quote Rosen) “advising you that, surprise, it was Election Day. There was a link where you could find your polling place, a button that said either ‘I'm voting’ or ‘I'm a voter,’ and pictures of the faces of friends who had already declared they had voted, which also appeared in your News Feed. If you saw something like that, you were in good company: 96 percent of 18-and-older U.S. Facebook users got that treatment, assigned randomly.”
Or maybe you were part of the other 4% of Facebook users. They form the various control groups for the research, depending on whether they received no message, just their friends’ messages, or other permutations of the experimental design.
The next step for the Fowler-Facebook team: to apply specific numbers to Facebook’s effects. They’ll do this by matching the feedback received from each of these groupings of individuals to the actual voting rolls, which are public data.
It’s no understatement to say that this is a Really Big experiment. A similar go-vote message -- described in Fowler’s 2010 research -- reached some 60 million Facebook users, and of course there are even more Facebook users today.
The Atlantic concludes, “In a country where elections can turn on just a couple hundred votes, it's not far-fetched to say that, down the road, Facebook's efforts to improve voter participation could swing an election, if they haven't already.”
On a different note, you might like to enjoy some post-Election relief with 5 minutes of laughter, as Stephen Colbert interviews James Fowler about the social-network research that led to his best-seller (with Activate Networks’ Scientific Founder Nicholas Christakis), Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives.
Image credit: brettneilson
Steve is responsible for Activate Networks’ corporate and product marketing, market research, communications, and events. He brings more than 13 years of technology experience in senior marketing and business development roles with organizations such as PatientKeeper, Informed Clinical Sciences, Apeiron Partners, and Sonexis, and has led over 100 business events. He holds a BA and MBA from Harvard and an MPhil from Cambridge University.
You can find Steve on Google+.
Send us a question about human networks in business and we’ll give you our best answer in two business days.
60 minutes, academic paper, accountable care organization, accountable care organizations, acctivate networks, aco, acos, activate networks, activate networks summit, activate networks summit 2012, affordable care act, albert-laszlo barabasi, albert-lazslo barabasi, alberto-laszlo barabasi, andrea kates, barry libert, behavior change, betweenness, big data, booz, boston globe, brian cusack, brigitta tadmore, cbs, center for creative leadership, change agents, christakis, christakis lab, christakis laboratory, christopher perkins, claims data, closeness, cognitive science of religion, collaboration, collaboration management, communities of influence, conference, connected, connectivity, contagion, contagion effect, counterinsurgency, craig venter, csr, cultural norms, cultural phylogenetics, culture, cure violence, darren bovie, data analysis, data mining, dave parkhurst, de-energizers, detailing, diffusion, digital immortality, e-mail traffic data, egocentric networks, eigenvector, elizabeth rula, energizers, evolution, excel venture management, facebook, flight risks, forbes, founders network, fowler, friends, front end of innovation, george dyson, greg gallo, gregory gallo, harvard gazette, healthways, heathways, hospitals, hr, influence, influence of social networks, influence patterns, influencer, influencers, infographic, information flow, inheritance, innovation, innovators of the year, inovation diffusion, jama, james fowler, jon katzenbach, journal of the american medical association, juan enriquez, juniper networks, larry miller, life sciences practice, luke matthews, map, map networks, mapping networks, marings, mark fishman, mednetworks, microsoft, mit, modern management, multiplier effect, network, network-driven solutions, network analysis, network analytics, network centrality, networking, network map, network mapping, network maps, network outlook, network roundtable conference, networks, network science, network scientists, network structure, neuroleadership institute, new york times, next-gen health it, nibr, nicholas christakis, novartis, npr, ny times, off-line social network, ona, ona network analytics, ona organizational network analysis, online networks, online social networks, organic acos, organizational analysis, organizational effectiveness, organizational network analysis, organizational network analytics, personal network assessment, pete dewan, peter dewan, pharma brand manager, physician groups, physician social networks, pm360, pna, premier healthcare alliance, president obama, productivity, profits, pulse network, ray kurzweil, real-life networks, real-life social network analysis, real-world and online social networks, real-world networks, real-world social network, real-world social networks, real friends, reed elsevier ventures, relational datasets, religious extremism, retention, rob cross, ron burt, science friday, sean moffit, sean moffitt, sean tierney, security, series b, shapeup, sloan management review, sna, social-influence, social collaboration, social contagion, social hetworks, social ilnfluence, social influence, social marketing, social network, social network analysis, social network analytics, social network influence, social networking, social network mapping, social network maps, social networks, social network software, steven wardell, steve rosenberg, steve wardell, structural relations, summit, summit 2011, summit 2012, survey data, talent, talent management, targeting, ted conference, tedmed, ted talk, tedx, the atlantic, the network roundtable, thomas valente, tom warren, top talent, training, turnover, venture capital funding, virtual social network, voter services, voting, w. cecyl hobbs, wayne caldwell, webinar, wired, work-force science, yammer,